Algorithmic Complexity Attack
An algorithmic complexity attack is a sophisticated form of cyber attack that exploits the algorithmic complexity of a computer system's operations to degrade its performance. These attacks take advantage of the fact that certain data structures and algorithms have worst-case performance scenarios, which can be triggered by specifically crafted inputs. By doing so, the attacker can cause excessive consumption of computational resources, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) condition without needing an overwhelming amount of attack traffic.
The concept of algorithmic complexity attacks is deeply rooted in computational complexity theory, a branch of theoretical computer science that focuses on classifying computational problems based on the resources required to solve them. This includes the time complexity, which describes the amount of computer time it takes to run an algorithm, and space complexity, which measures the amount of memory space required.
These attacks often exploit algorithms that operate in different complexity classes, such as P, NP, or other classes, by triggering their worst-case scenarios. Understanding the complexity class of an algorithm is crucial in assessing its vulnerability to such attacks.
There are several types of algorithmic complexity attacks, each targeting different algorithmic weaknesses:
A ReDoS attack occurs when an attacker sends inputs designed to trigger the worst-case scenario of a regular expression engine, causing excessive backtracking that monopolizes CPU resources.
In a hash collision attack, the adversary sends multiple inputs that hash to the same value, leading to performance degradation in hash table implementations. This technique was famously demonstrated by Dan Bernstein in 2003.
Also known as the XML Bomb, the Billion Laughs attack exploits the XML parsers' limited ability to process nested entities. This causes exponential growth in processing time and can crash the system.
To counter algorithmic complexity attacks, developers must ensure their code is resilient against such worst-case scenarios:
Input Validation: Properly validate and sanitize input data to prevent malicious patterns from being processed.
Algorithm Selection: Choose algorithms with better worst-case performance or use probabilistic algorithms that handle such cases more gracefully.
Rate Limiting: Implement rate limiting mechanisms to mitigate the impact of excessive request patterns.
Use of Secure Hash Functions: Employ cryptographic hash functions like SipHash that are resistant to collision attacks.
Regular Updates and Patching: Keep systems up-to-date with patches that address known vulnerabilities and improve algorithmic implementations.